⚛ Computational Drug Design • AI-Powered

From Target to Preclinical Candidate
in Weeks, Not Years

GIAST offers two fully integrated, AI-powered drug discovery platforms — one for small molecules and one for protein therapeutics — compressing timelines from 2–3 years to 20–26 weeks through proprietary generative AI and physics-based simulation.

🔬 Small Molecule Discovery 🧬 Protein Therapeutics 🏳 Full IP Transfer ⚡ AI + Physics-Based 📋 Milestone-Gated
Request a Briefing Call ↗ Explore Services ↓
What We Do

An End-to-End Computational Drug Discovery Platform

GIAST replaces traditional library-screening and wet-lab iteration with a proprietary AI-first pipeline. Every candidate is designed from structural first principles, filtered through rigorous physics-based simulation, and assessed for ADMET, developability, and PK/PD suitability — entirely in silico. You receive a portfolio of preclinical candidates with full data packages, ready for experimental validation.

20–26 wks
From kick-off to preclinical candidate nomination (vs. 2–3 years conventional)
2 platforms
Small molecule AND protein therapeutics — mini-proteins, nanobodies, peptides, full IgG
100% IP
Full intellectual property transfer to client on program completion
<1 kcal/mol
Target binding free energy uncertainty via FEP alchemical methods
🔬 Small Molecule Drug Discovery

AI-Powered Small Molecule Discovery — Target to Candidate in 20–22 Weeks

A five-phase, milestone-gated platform integrating multi-omics target identification, consensus virtual screening across commercial and natural product libraries, solvation thermodynamics, free energy perturbation, and full ADMET/PBPK profiling. Every gate requires quantitative evidence before advancing.

Platform Headline
Compresses the typical hit-to-lead timeline from 18–24 months to approximately 20–22 weeks through parallel computation, automated triage, and quantitative decision gates at every phase boundary.
5 Phases • 20–22 Weeks

Compound Libraries Screened

Four Complementary Screening Libraries

🏭
Commercial Screening Libraries
Large-scale purchasable compound collections (drug-like, fragment, and focused subsets) from leading commercial suppliers. Selected for Ro5 compliance, synthetic tractability, and in-stock availability.
🌿
Natural Product Libraries
Curated natural product collections with diverse chemical scaffolds and privileged frameworks. Full stereochemistry assignment, tautomer enumeration, and TPSA correction applied before docking.
💊
FDA-Approved Drug Repurposing Set
Complete set of approved small molecules screened for activity against your target. Key advantage: established safety and PK profile accelerates progression if activity is confirmed.
🤖
AI-Generated Custom Library
De novo generative AI design conditioned on target-specific structural features. Fingerprint similarity, pharmacophore queries, scaffold decoration, bioisosteric substitution, and R-group enumeration.

Five-Phase Pipeline

Milestone-Gated Workflow

1
Biomarker, Target Discovery & Pocket Evaluation
Weeks 1–3

Multi-omics analysis integrating genomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics identifies disease-driver genes beyond literature bias. Targets are scored using a proprietary quantitative Target Prioritisation Matrix (TPM). Protein structures are retrieved from PDB or predicted by AI for novel targets, then subjected to conformational ensemble generation via MD. Binding pockets are identified by a multi-tool consensus approach including geometry-based detection, energy-based scoring, Gaussian density mapping, and MD-driven cryptic pocket detection on the conformational ensemble — capturing allosteric and transiently-open pockets that static methods miss.

Ranked pocket atlas Druggability heatmaps Target Prioritisation Matrix Go/No-Go memorandum
2
Virtual Screening & Library Curation
Weeks 3–7

All compounds pass a tiered filter cascade before docking: physicochemical filters (Ro5, Veber), PAINS removal, reactive group elimination, structural toxicity alerts, and indication-specific ADMET gating. Remaining compounds proceed to consensus docking across multiple industry-standard platforms, covalent docking for Cys/Ser/Lys-targeting warheads, induced-fit docking for receptor plasticity, pharmacophore-based ligand screening, and deep learning rescoring post-docking for improved rank correlation.

Filtered & docked compound set Consensus scores Interaction fingerprints Phase 2 screening report
3
Hit Identification & MD Re-Scoring
Weeks 7–10

Top-ranked poses are clustered for scaffold diversity, then subjected to short MD simulations (20–50 ns) for pose stability and binding mode validation. Solvation thermodynamics analysis captures water displacement contributions — a major affinity driver invisible to docking and standard MM-GBSA. MM-PBSA rescoring is applied to the shortlisted top hits, followed by AI-enhanced proprietary pose refinement. Gate criterion: ≥20 hits with stable MD pose and ΔG < −7 kcal/mol.

MD-validated hit list (20–50 cpds) Binding mode visualisations Binding free energy estimates Synthesis recommendations
4
Hit Optimisation & Synthesis Feasibility
Weeks 10–18

Confirmed hits undergo rigorous alchemical free energy perturbation (ABFE and RBFE, <1 kcal/mol uncertainty) to guide quantitative SAR. Scaffold hopping, fragment elaboration, matched molecular pair analysis, and bioisosteric replacements expand chemical space while maintaining binding mode. Every proposed analogue passes a two-tier synthesis feasibility assessment: AI-driven retrosynthetic route generation with yield prediction, commercial building block availability check, and IP freedom-to-operate screening. Red IP flags or synthesis failures are replaced before advancing.

Lead series (3–5 scaffolds) FEP-ranked binding free energies SAR landscape summary Proposed synthesis routes Selectivity heatmap
5
ADMET, PK/PD & Multiparameter Optimisation
Weeks 15–22

Comprehensive in silico ADMET profiling covering solubility, Caco-2 permeability, plasma protein binding, BBB penetration, P-gp, oral bioavailability, Vd, and t½. DMPK profiling covers all major CYP isoforms, metabolic soft-spot prediction, intrinsic clearance, reactive metabolite flags, and Phase II metabolism. Safety flags include hERG, Ames, DILI, QT prolongation, and skin sensitisation. Full PBPK modelling projects human systemic and tissue exposure across dose levels. All parameters integrated into a composite MPO scorecard with Pareto-front visualisation aligned to the agreed Target Product Profile.

Full ADMET/DMPK report PBPK model output MPO-scored lead ranking 3–5 preclinical candidates IND-enabling roadmap
🧬 Protein Therapeutics Design

AI-Powered Protein Therapeutics Discovery — Four Modalities, One Campaign

A six-phase generative AI platform designing mini-proteins, nanobodies, peptide binders, and full IgG antibodies from structural first principles — no library screening required. Candidates are conditioned on the precise 3D geometry of the target binding interface, validated by physics-based simulation, and assessed for developability, immunogenicity, and clinical PK/PD suitability.

Platform Headline
Reduces the typical protein therapeutic discovery timeline from 2–3 years to approximately 22–26 weeks. Structural novelty >95% vs. known therapeutics maximises IP freedom-to-operate from day one.
6 Phases • 22–26 Weeks

Four Therapeutic Modalities

All Four Modalities Designed in Parallel

📊
Mini-Protein
10–40 residues
De novo binders, receptor blockers, PPI inhibitors. Compact, highly stable, fully synthetic. Supports cyclic and symmetric formats.
🚀
Nanobody (VHH)
~15 kDa
Single-domain antibody fragment. CNS-penetrant formats available. High target accessibility. Humanisation included.
📈
Peptide Binder
5–30 residues
Constrained, cyclic, or stapled formats. Superior tissue penetration and rapid synthetic access for IND programs.
🧬
Full Antibody (IgG)
~150 kDa
VH/VL paired design, CDR engineering, Fc effector function and half-life optimisation. Bispecific formats included.

Six-Phase Pipeline

Milestone-Gated Workflow

1
Target Identification, Epitope Mapping & Structural Characterisation
Weeks 1–3

Targets are assessed by a proprietary Target Prioritisation Matrix integrating multi-omics, literature databases, and quantitative genetic/functional evidence. Experimental PDB structures are retrieved and quality-filtered; AI-predicted structures are generated for novel or under-crystallised targets. Conformational ensembles capture flexibility, loop dynamics, and transient pocket opening. Epitope mapping employs B-cell accessibility prediction, T-cell MHC-I/II binding affinity, PPI hotspot alanine-scanning, buried surface area analysis, and cross-species conservation overlay — producing a binding interface atlas with hotspot heatmaps and selectivity risk flags.

Target confidence matrix (TPM) Structural ensemble Binding interface atlas Epitope heatmaps Target Selection Memorandum
2
Generative AI De Novo Protein Design
Weeks 3–8

The core of the platform: proprietary diffusion-based generative AI designs backbone scaffolds conditioned directly on the target binding interface — no template or known binder required. 10,000–100,000 backbone proposals are generated per target site. A proprietary inverse-folding neural network then designs amino acid sequences predicted to fold stably into the target geometry, with multi-sample diversity at varying sampling temperatures. Antibody and nanobody design uses specialist immunoglobulin AI covering VHH, VH/VL paired design, CDR-H3 loop generation, bispecific formats, Fc engineering, and humanisation. All designed sequences undergo self-consistency validation: TM-score ≥0.85 and interface confidence ≥80 required to advance.

Designed sequence libraries (FASTA + models) Self-consistency scores All 4 modalities covered Design campaign summary
3
Computational Screening, Filtering & Hit Selection
Weeks 7–11

A tiered filter cascade removes low-quality, redundant, or developability-compromised candidates: sequence clustering at 80% identity, structure confidence thresholds, pI filtering (5.5–8.5), hydrophobicity and aggregation propensity prediction, thermal stability (Tm >60°C), cysteine mapping, and chemical degradation site scanning (deamidation, oxidation, isomerisation). Filtered candidates proceed to protein–protein docking with rigid-body and flexible ensemble protocols, interface energy decomposition, buried surface area thresholds (≥600–1,600 Ų by modality), shape complementarity (Sc ≥0.60), and hotspot contact coverage. Gate criterion: ≥20 candidates passing all pre-filter criteria.

Shortlisted candidates (20–50) Docked complex structures Interface annotations Composite interface score ranking
4
MD Simulation, Binding Free Energy & Iterative Optimisation
Weeks 11–18

All-atom MD simulation (100–500 ns, GPU-accelerated) validates binding mode stability, interface contact persistence (>70% trajectory duration), and thermal stability. Solvation thermodynamics analysis is integrated. For leads progressing to candidate status, alchemical FEP provides ABFE (ΔG uncertainty ≤1 kcal/mol) and RBFE (ΔΔG uncertainty ≤0.5 kcal/mol) for quantitative structure–activity guidance. Iterative sequence optimisation via proprietary inverse-folding redesign, computational saturation mutagenesis, and directed evolution simulation achieves 2–10 fold improvement in predicted ΔG per optimisation round. Proteome-wide homology scan and paralogue cross-docking ensure selectivity margins.

FEP-ranked leads (5–10 per modality) MD stability profiles Affinity-matured sequences Selectivity heatmap
5
Developability, Immunogenicity & Manufacturability
Weeks 15–21

Comprehensive in silico biophysical developability panel: solubility, colloidal stability, SAP aggregation scoring, thermal stability (Tm >65°C threshold), high-concentration viscosity, chemical stability (deamidation/oxidation/isomerisation), and polyreactivity prediction. Multi-layer immunogenicity assessment covers T-cell epitope mapping across 15+ HLA-DR/DP/DQ alleles (>90% global population coverage), B-cell epitope prediction, antibody humanness scoring, germline deviation, and in silico deimmunisation where required. CMC assessment covers expression system compatibility (E. coli/Pichia/CHO/HEK293), signal peptide optimisation, disulfide mapping, glycosylation prediction, proteolytic stability, and formulation compatibility.

Developability dossier Biophysical risk scorecard Multi-allele immunogenicity assessment CMC flags & expression recommendations Deimmunised sequence variants
6
In Silico PK/PD, Half-Life Prediction & Therapeutic Format Engineering
Weeks 18–26

PK/PD modelling covers FcRn-mediated half-life (IgG/Fc-fusions), renal clearance prediction, serum stability, tissue penetration (superior for nanobodies vs. full IgG), target-mediated drug disposition, and full PBPK simulation for human dose projection. Therapeutic format engineering designs half-life extension (Fc fusion, albumin binding, PEGylation sites), bispecific antibodies, bivalent VHH tandems, ADC conjugation sites, pH-sensitive antigen release, and cell-penetrating fusions for intracellular targets. All outputs integrated into a composite MPO scorecard with Pareto-front visualisation across binding affinity, developability, immunogenicity, and PK suitability.

PK/PD model & dose projections Format engineering options MPO Pareto scorecard 3–5 preclinical candidates IND-enabling roadmap

Service Comparison

Which Platform is Right for You?

Feature 🔬 Small Molecule 🧬 Protein Therapeutics
Therapeutic modalitySmall molecules (oral/IV)Mini-protein, nanobody, peptide, IgG
Design approachVirtual screening + AI generative designGenerative AI backbone + inverse folding
Compound source4 libraries screenedDe novo designed from scratch
Structural noveltyDepends on library>95% vs. known therapeutics
Covalent targeting✓ Cys/Ser/Lys protocols
IP freedom-to-operate✓ Integrated FTO screening✓ Maximal (de novo design)
MD simulation20–50 ns hit validation100–500 ns complex stability
Binding free energy (FEP)✓ ABFE + RBFE (<1 kcal/mol)✓ ABFE + RBFE (<1 kcal/mol)
ADMET profiling✓ Full in silico panel✓ Biophysical developability panel
Immunogenicity assessment✓ 15+ HLA alleles, deimmunisation
Synthesis feasibility✓ AI retrosynthesis + FTO✓ Codon optimisation + expression system
PK/PD modelling✓ PBPK, tissue distribution✓ PBPK, FcRn, renal clearance, TMDD
Program duration20–22 weeks22–26 weeks
IP transfer on completion✓ Full ownership to client✓ Full ownership to client
Modular engagement✓ Individual phases available✓ Individual phases available

What You Receive

A Structured Deliverables Package

Every program concludes with a comprehensive data package formatted for internal scientific use, CRO handoff, and regulatory submission. All data delivered via secure encrypted transfer with full method documentation and analysis provenance.

📄
Phase Reports
Full scientific narrative per phase — rationale, results, interpretation, and quantitative gate recommendation with go/no-go decision.
PDF + DOCX
🧲
Structural Data Package
All-atom protein–ligand complex models for shortlisted candidates. Representative MD simulation frames. Docking grids and poses.
PDB + ZIP archive
📊
Compound / Sequence Data Tables
SMILES or FASTA sequences with docking scores, FEP ΔG values, ADMET data, MPO scores, and synthesis feasibility ratings across all candidates.
Excel + SDF / FASTA
📋
ADMET / Developability Dossier
Full biophysical profile: solubility, permeability, hERG, CYP, BBB, aggregation, Tm, chemical stability, and polyreactivity across all lead candidates.
PDF + Excel dashboard
🔗
FEP Binding Free Energy Data
ABFE and RBFE binding free energy values with uncertainty estimates and thermodynamic cycle closure analysis. Perturbation maps for lead series.
PDF + data tables
💋
Synthesis Route Booklet
AI-generated retrosynthetic routes for top 5–10 leads with step count, reaction conditions, reagent sources, yield estimates, and cost projections.
PDF
💉
Immunogenicity Assessment
Multi-allele T-cell epitope map across 15+ HLA alleles, humanness scores, B-cell epitope risk, and deimmunised sequence variants where generated. (Protein therapeutics only.)
PDF + FASTA
📈
PBPK/PD Model Report
Full physiological PK/PD model output, half-life predictions, tissue distribution, dose–exposure–response projection, and IND-enabling study design guidance.
PDF + model files
🏆
Preclinical Candidate Nomination
Top 3–5 candidates with complete data package, MPO Pareto analysis, IP freedom-to-operate summary, and a written IND-enabling roadmap.
PDF + executive slide deck

Indicative Timelines

From Kick-Off to Candidate Nomination

🔬 Small Molecule — 20–22 Weeks
P1
Wk 1–3
Target & Pocket
P2
Wk 3–7
Virtual Screening
P3
Wk 7–10
Hit ID & Rescoring
P4
Wk 10–18
Hit Optimisation
P5
Wk 15–22
ADMET & PK/PD
Wk 21–22
Candidate Handoff
🧬 Protein Therapeutics — 22–26 Weeks
P1
Wk 1–3
Target & Epitope
P2
Wk 3–8
GenAI Design
P3
Wk 7–11
Computational Screening
P4
Wk 11–18
MD & FEP
P5
Wk 15–21
Developability
P6
Wk 18–26
PK/PD & Handoff
IP, Confidentiality & Commercial Terms

Transparent Terms from Day One

🔒
Full IP Transfer
All designed sequences, structural models, computational outputs, and generated data transfer fully to you upon final payment. No restrictions on application or licensing. Our generative AI models and proprietary workflows remain exclusively ours.
📋
Milestone-Based Fees
Pricing provided following a Target Briefing Call once modality selection and program scope are confirmed. Fee structure is milestone-gated, with payment tranches aligned to quantitative phase-gate deliverables. Modular and expedited engagement available.
👁
Strict Confidentiality
All work performed under a mutually executed CDA/NDA before any data exchange. Proprietary AI models, tool identities, and platform architectures are not disclosed. A freedom-to-operate assessment is included in every program.

Ready to Start Your Program?

Schedule a 60-minute Target Briefing Call. We will align on your indication, target class, modality preference, available data, and program goals — then issue a detailed Scope of Work and budget within 5 business days.

Request a Briefing Call ↗ Back to All Programs

Or write to us directly: giastusa.org@gmail.com — we respond within 48 hours.